Achievement Goal Theory
Specifically, task (mastery) goals reflect perceived competence in terms of absolute evaluative standards or task mastery. When someone is task-involved, her primary goal is learning and mastery of the task for its own sake. Task involvement appears when the athlete is intrinsically interested in the activity and judges herself in a self-referenced manner. Therefore, task oriented goals rely on comparisons with requirements of the task and/or internal comparisons with one’s past attainment or one’s maximum potential attainment. There is a focus on effort and improvement.
Ego (performance) goals reflect competence perception relative to the performance of others. Therefore, ego oriented athletes define their competence in terms of interpersonal and normative comparisons.
These two goal orientations determine different consequences in achievement context. In general, task orientation is regarded as more adaptive than ego orientation. Task orientation is related to selection of challenging tasks, effective study strategies, positive attitudes toward learning, and positive emotions, whereas quite often ego orientation is associated with selection of easier tasks, trivial learning strategies, concern for social status, and thoughts of escape and behavioral withdrawal when difficulties are encountered (Dweck & Leggett 1988; Biddle, Wang, & Kavussanu, 2003; Kaplan & Maehr 2007; Bortoli, Bertollo, Comani, & Robazza, 2011). However, if high perceived competence is combined with high task orientation, then ego orientation supports positive achievement outcomes (Fox, Goudas, Biddle, Duda, & Armstrong, 1994; Standage & Treasure 2002; Xiang, McBride, Bruene, & Liu, 2007).
Biddle, S., Wang, C. K. J., & Kavussanu, M. (2003). Correlates of achievement goal orientations in physical activity: A systematic review of research. European Journal of Sport Science 3, 1-20.
Bortoli, L., Bertollo, M., Comani, S., & Robazza, C. (2011). Competence, achievement goals, motivational climate, and pleasant psychobiosocial states in youth sport. Journal of Sports Sciences, 29, 171-180.
Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040-1048.
Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256-273.
Fox, K., Goudas, M., Biddle, S., Duda, J., & Armstrong, N. (1994). Children’s task and ego goal profiles in sport. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 64, 253-261.
Kaplan, A., & Maehr, M. L. (2007). The contributions and prospects of goal orientation theory. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 141-184
Nicholls, J. G. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review, 91, 328-346.
Nicholls, J. G. (1989). The competitive ethos and democratic education. Cambridge, M.A.: Harvard Uiiversity Press.
Standage, M., & Treasure, D. C. (2002). Relationship among achievement goal orientations and multidimensional situational motivation in physical education. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 87-103.
Xiang, P., McBride, R. E., Bruene, A., & Liu, Y. (2007). Achievement goal orientation patterns and fifth graders’ motivation in physical education running programs. Pediatric Exercise Science, 19, 179-191.